🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," stated one MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a influential peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the regional government level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures requiring adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are less and less prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.